Van Buren County Iowa court recordsToday's
Top Headlines & News
Pennsylvania State Court Decisions
1. Civil Litigation
1.1. Causes of Action - Learned Intermediary
► Superior Court of Pennsylvania
♦ Lineberger v. Wyeth
2006 PA Super 35 (February 23, 2006)
Holding: In a pharmaceutical liability claim against a drug manufacturer, in order to avoid having the claim barred by the learned intermediary doctrine, the plaintiff must prove that the prescribing physician would not have prescribed the drug had the manufacturer provided a different.
1.2. Evidence - Intoxication
► Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
♦ Lock v. City of Philadelphia
No. 1637 C.D. 2005 (March 27, 2006)
Holding: When recklessness or carelessness is at issue, Click here to read more from this article
... Breaking"Van Buren County Iowa court records"
Stories:
Washington County Missouri court records Bollinger County Missouri court records
Gove County Kansas court records Dodge County Nebraska court records Top
Related "Van Buren County Iowa court records" Queries:
Powhatan County Virginia court records
Guthrie County Iowa court records Miller County Georgia court records Click
Here to Read More Henry County Iowa court records Bremer County Iowa court records Guthrie County Iowa court records Adams County Iowa court records Clarke County Iowa court records Jackson County Iowa court records Decatur County Iowa court records Des Moines County Iowa court records Pocahontas County Iowa court records Black Hawk County Iowa court records Delaware County Iowa court records Story County Iowa court records Clinton County Iowa court records Tama County Iowa court records
Related
Articles:
REPORTING DECISIONS THROUGH FEBRUARY 3, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA STATE COURT DECISIONS
1. CAUSES OF ACTION
1.1. Civil Remedies For Violations of State Constitutional Rights
► Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ♦ Jones v. City
of Philadelphia No. 795 C.D. 2004 (January 25, 2006)
Holding: A city or other local government is not liable for
monetary damages under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania
Constitution for a claim of excessive force. Of note is the en
banc Court's finding that the plaintiff failed to show that his
rights against governmental use of excessive force were not
sufficiently protected by the Fourth Amendment. Judge
Smith-Ribner filed a dissenting opinion, in which she was joined
by Judge Click here to read more from this article
...
Firewire
|
Air Conditioner
|
Computer Server
|
Charter Boat
|