Montcalm County Michigan court recordsToday's
Top Headlines & News
Recently, there has been a huge upsurge in the number of sexual harassment lawsuits. It started with Anita Hill's televised testimony at the Clarence Thomas Senate Confirmation hearing to become a Supreme Court Justice in 1991. Then Paula Jones' lawsuit against President Bill Clinton and several multi-million dollar verdicts have caused a wave of litigation. In 1998, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down two important decisions that put the ball in the employer's court in sexual harassment lawsuits. Basically, they gave employers what we call an "affirmative defense," provided that they have a policy in place
Click here to read more from this article
... Breaking"Montcalm County Michigan court records"
Stories:
Clinton County New York court records Monroe County Tennessee divorce records
Keweenaw County Michigan court records Phelps County Nebraska court records Top
Related "Montcalm County Michigan court records" Queries:
Morgan County Missouri court records
Oakland County Michigan court records Lamar County Texas court records Click
Here to Read More Arenac County Michigan court records
Emmet County Michigan court records
Oakland County Michigan court records
Van Buren County Michigan court records
Roscommon County Michigan court records
Crawford County Michigan court records
Ingham County Michigan court records
Manistee County Michigan court records
Ontonagon County Michigan court records
Montmorency County Michigan court records
St. Joseph County Michigan court records
Mecosta County Michigan court records
Otsego County Michigan court records
Shiawassee County Michigan court records
Related
Articles:
REPORTING DECISIONS THROUGH FEBRUARY 3, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA STATE COURT DECISIONS
1. CAUSES OF ACTION
1.1. Civil Remedies For Violations of State Constitutional Rights
► Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ♦ Jones v. City
of Philadelphia No. 795 C.D. 2004 (January 25, 2006)
Holding: A city or other local government is not liable for
monetary damages under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania
Constitution for a claim of excessive force. Of note is the en
banc Court's finding that the plaintiff failed to show that his
rights against governmental use of excessive force were not
sufficiently protected by the Fourth Amendment. Judge
Smith-Ribner filed a dissenting opinion, in which she was joined
by Judge
Click here to read more from this article
...
Retail Zap
|
Chef Jobs
| 
