Andrews County Texas court recordsToday's
Top Headlines & News
Pennsylvania State Court Decisions
1. Civil Litigation
1.1. Causes of Action - Learned Intermediary
► Superior Court of Pennsylvania
♦ Lineberger v. Wyeth
2006 PA Super 35 (February 23, 2006)
Holding: In a pharmaceutical liability claim against a drug manufacturer, in order to avoid having the claim barred by the learned intermediary doctrine, the plaintiff must prove that the prescribing physician would not have prescribed the drug had the manufacturer provided a different.
1.2. Evidence - Intoxication
► Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
♦ Lock v. City of Philadelphia
No. 1637 C.D. 2005 (March 27, 2006)
Holding: When recklessness or carelessness is at issue,
Click here to read more from this article
... Breaking"Andrews County Texas court records"
Stories:
Bledsoe County Tennessee divorce records Greenup County Kentucky court records
Schuyler County Missouri court records Fairfield County South Carolina court records Top
Related "Andrews County Texas court records" Queries:
Scioto County Ohio court records
Matagorda County Texas court records Jefferson Davis Parish Louisiana court records Click
Here to Read More Lamb County Texas court records
Armstrong County Texas court records
Matagorda County Texas court records
Midland County Texas court records
Shackelford County Texas court records
Grimes County Texas court records
Childress County Texas court records
Mills County Texas court records
Rusk County Texas court records
Uvalde County Texas court records
Hansford County Texas court records
DeWitt County Texas court records
Jasper County Texas court records
Callahan County Texas court records
Related
Articles:
REPORTING DECISIONS THROUGH FEBRUARY 3, 2006
PENNSYLVANIA STATE COURT DECISIONS
1. CAUSES OF ACTION
1.1. Civil Remedies For Violations of State Constitutional Rights
► Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ♦ Jones v. City
of Philadelphia No. 795 C.D. 2004 (January 25, 2006)
Holding: A city or other local government is not liable for
monetary damages under Article I, Section 8 of the Pennsylvania
Constitution for a claim of excessive force. Of note is the en
banc Court's finding that the plaintiff failed to show that his
rights against governmental use of excessive force were not
sufficiently protected by the Fourth Amendment. Judge
Smith-Ribner filed a dissenting opinion, in which she was joined
by Judge
Click here to read more from this article
...
retailzap.com
| 
